Skip to main content

Shirt wadder

I pinned the sleeve into the armhole and that didn’t look too bad. There woud be almost no seam allowance at the point of the ‘corner’ as described in my post from Sunday, but that wouldn’t be too bad.

 

During construction of the body of the shirt, I got the feeling that it was too wide and that the extra space for the bust was at the wrong place. This is a pattern with pattern pieces for different bust sizes, and I used the D-cup, which is the correct size according to the instructions.

When I had sewn shoulder and side seams it was time to test. For me this is completely not working. It is much too wide and the bust space is too much too the side. Lucky it’s not expensive fabric, pity about the time already invested in the collar and sleeves.

I’m going to sew another shirt from the Burda pattern I used last time and sew a muslin for a pair of much needed pants. Quickly forgetting this pattern.

Comments

  1. I find when I use these cup patterns for my daughter that using a size smaller with the d-cup pattern works better.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So glad this is your wadder and not mine. I was considering buying this pattern in the current sale. So I can save money as well as time. Sorry it didn't work for you though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bummer! But it's an important skill to know when to throw in the towel and move on to other (hopefully better) patterns.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's good you can let this one go. What a bummer it didn't work out, but it sounds like your next two projects will be very satisfying.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am a busty women (slight understatement), but I am NOT a fan of patterns with cup sizes. I'd rather add the dart myself. When the pattern has a dart, it's never the right size (not even a D or DD) and it's NEVER in the right location.

    What a shame. I was planning on buying this pattern. I wonder if it would work better to use the smallest cup size (or no cup, if that is available on the pattern) and then size up myself.

    ReplyDelete
  6. How annoying. I like the patterns with different cup sizes, (I am lazy) but there does seem to be a lot of ease at the bust in some of them, and like Shams, I find the dart placement a bit hit and miss. I will steer clear of this pattern!

    ReplyDelete
  7. How disappointing! I think you are right to just move on rather than grimly marching forward trying to redraft the pattern piece by piece. Hopefully your next project will be more satisfying.

    ReplyDelete
  8. That Vogue pattern is strange! What a shame because the line drawing is so nice. I wonder if you can still use the collar and cuffs on another shirt pattern? If you can get more of the same fabric. It would be nice to use them, they looked so good.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What a pity, but these things just happen every now and then. The first 2 pictures don't even look that bad to me. But if you feel it's a wadder then it's indeed time to move on to the next thing.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What a shame! Like Robin said, maybe you could reuse the collar and cuffs?

    ReplyDelete
  11. That's too bad, but it is good that you're just letting it go. Too often we keep at something that should have been let go much earlier in the process.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Do you have more fabric? An option would be to recut the body of the blouse in order to use the collar and sleeves.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's a pity it didn't work out like you hoped, but good on you for moving onwards and upward to new and better things! It does look like a strange pattern...

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm sorry that the pattern didn't work out for you, but I have to say I am glad that I'm not the only one having sizing issues with BMV patterns. According to their tables I would need a size 22 but this is way too large. I started to automatically make a size 20 which is much better. And it's the same with cup sizes: I would need Cup D according to instructions, but the C-Cup patterns fit me much better.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Oh, how sad... All that work... Would tissue fitting the pattern have worked to show you this possible problem?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ouch. That does look awful. Burda is always much better fit than Vogue, unless you're using Sandra Betzina who starts from her own block and not Vogue's standard ones. Sad..

    ReplyDelete
  17. Oh dear, too bad about this. :( But so smart to know when to wad it, rather than carry on and hate the final result.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hopefully you don't think of this as a waste of time, cause you learned a lot. Actually rotating some of those darts would have made them a lot more palatable, but in the long run, you learned a lot - and so yeah, it's a wadder, but at least you didn't let it stop you or get you down, AND you will be surprised the next time you're met with this sort of challenge how you'll plug right through! Personally, I think it takes a lot of moxie to post this, as other people can learn too.

    ReplyDelete
  19. What a shame - it's the time wasted that is most frustrating!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

It's always nice to have feedback on what I'm posting about. All comments, also positive criticism, are always highly appreciated.
Leuk als je een berichtje schrijft, altijd leuk om te lezen, ook opbouwende kritiek!

Popular posts from this blog

How to sew a sleeveless top with facings

How lovely to read the nice comments on my jacket. Grumpy without coffee commented that the original artist for the cartoon (which apparently was for books) was Sarah Andersen. Thank you for mentioning it. Beckster asked about the way I closed the center back seam of the lining. I did it by machine. She also said “Although I have not tried it, I have been told that the lining can be made by using the pattern minus the seam allowance and facings.” Well, certainly not without seam allowances, it should be without hem and without the facings. Important is that you have about 5 cm hem in the jacket for this to work. And I would always make a center back pleat. It gives you space to move without the lining pulling on the fabric. Next time I make a jacket I will try to make photos of the process of bagging the lining (Patsijean said she would have liked to see them and probably more would be interested). Might take a while though, see the end of this post.-----------------------------I mad…

Dress Burda June 2018, construction picture

Once in a while a pattern shows up in a magazine that I want to make immediately. This Burda dress from the June issue is one of those.It’s mainly the linedrawing that’s interesting, as the fabric they used for the magazine issue is not really showing the design lines. There would have been better accent options for the piping they uses. If you’re like me and in general don’t look at the Burda instructions but do it by experience or your way anyhow, DON’T go on autopilot with this one. Sleeveless dress: I close shoulder seams at the last possible moment. Not here, as you have to sew the bias band in between the center and side parts. The band has no seam (and I wouldn’t add one, too many layers of fabric), so the shoulder has to be sewn earlier than I’m used to.Darts: I was inclined to sew all darts as first step and realised really just in time that the front dart is taking up the edge of the band. Front and back band! I was stupified why the angle of the band was not matching the si…

Hilarious description

This week I bought the January Burda issue and browsing through it this top, and especially its description had my attention. Written by someone who has no understanding of modern, functional fabrics and never goes to the gym. Don’t know whether it’s the same in the English issue of the magazine, but in Dutch it says “Sport shirts often have the disadvantage to be close fitted.  This restricts your movement. Our suggestion: make this shirt with a full draped back.“I didn’t care to check their description of sports shirts they published before, but thought this one was hilarious.Off to trace a pattern from this magazine (not this one).