Skip to main content

A Vogue from 1956

I know you might be expecting me showing my pants, but it isn't finished yet. Almost there, but a few little things still have to be done.

Below a few pictures from a Vogue from 1956 which I found on a local site when I looked for some older BWOF issues. One of the sellers also had this Vogue issue from 1956 for sale and I bought it. I'm not really into vintage style sewing (yet), but I do like to see books and magazines with clothes and patterns of the past. Aren't they wonderful feminine clothes? And it's a bit difficult to see in most of the pictures, but the lines are so special on some of these designs.

 

 

Comments

  1. What a great find. Gorgeous dresses, but not what I would have expected from the mid '50's - very slim lined, except for the first one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely divine! You knew I'd say that, didn't you?;)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh those clothes are gorgeous! They really knew how to dress then!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sigrid .- that beautiful images. thanks for show. I absolutely love all the suits and dresses.

    Greetings,
    Paco

    ReplyDelete
  5. Beautiful! I see a vintage garment in your future!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes those lovely details are why I fell in love with vintage patterns last year! That was a great find!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow, look at those itty bitty waists!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Such beauty- and perfect for a Barbie doll lol. I don't think a simple girdle will do the trick here. But love the details, thanks for posting this Sigrid.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Lovely pictures! I collect sewing and knitting magazines from the late 50's and early 60's. Just love them! The level of detail on those garments is much greater than most things seen today.
    And I want whatever undergarments they wore to make their hips and waists look like that. (They can keep the bullet bras.)

    ReplyDelete
  10. These are just so beautiful, aren't they?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Those models are fabulous and very inspiring! Thanks for sharing them!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I gotta tell you--girdles must have been "THE" undergarment! All those models look like they have 23 or 24" waists. I LOVE the styles, but who has waists like that these days??? Okay. Most women I know that have tiny waists bemoan their hip size. Then you have people like me that have smallish hips with a larger waist size. The first time I measured my waist was in 7th grade and it was 27". I'm lucky in that it hasn't varied much from that figure, but it's never been tiny. The magazines from that time period make one think that most women in the '50's were shaped like this but I have old family photos from that time period and while women did seem generally thinner, many had the same issues we face today. Maybe 60 years from now people will pick up Vogue from today and will be thinking all women were anorexic sticks LOL.

    But I sure like those styles and I dress like that (with that figure) in my dreams ;) .

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

It's always nice to have feedback on what I'm posting about. All comments, also positive criticism, are always highly appreciated.
Leuk als je een berichtje schrijft, altijd leuk om te lezen, ook opbouwende kritiek!

Popular posts from this blog

How to sew a sleeveless top with facings

How lovely to read the nice comments on my jacket. Grumpy without coffee commented that the original artist for the cartoon (which apparently was for books) was Sarah Andersen. Thank you for mentioning it. Beckster asked about the way I closed the center back seam of the lining. I did it by machine. She also said “Although I have not tried it, I have been told that the lining can be made by using the pattern minus the seam allowance and facings.” Well, certainly not without seam allowances, it should be without hem and without the facings. Important is that you have about 5 cm hem in the jacket for this to work. And I would always make a center back pleat. It gives you space to move without the lining pulling on the fabric. Next time I make a jacket I will try to make photos of the process of bagging the lining (Patsijean said she would have liked to see them and probably more would be interested). Might take a while though, see the end of this post.-----------------------------I mad…

Dress Burda June 2018, construction picture

Once in a while a pattern shows up in a magazine that I want to make immediately. This Burda dress from the June issue is one of those.It’s mainly the linedrawing that’s interesting, as the fabric they used for the magazine issue is not really showing the design lines. There would have been better accent options for the piping they uses. If you’re like me and in general don’t look at the Burda instructions but do it by experience or your way anyhow, DON’T go on autopilot with this one. Sleeveless dress: I close shoulder seams at the last possible moment. Not here, as you have to sew the bias band in between the center and side parts. The band has no seam (and I wouldn’t add one, too many layers of fabric), so the shoulder has to be sewn earlier than I’m used to.Darts: I was inclined to sew all darts as first step and realised really just in time that the front dart is taking up the edge of the band. Front and back band! I was stupified why the angle of the band was not matching the si…

Hilarious description

This week I bought the January Burda issue and browsing through it this top, and especially its description had my attention. Written by someone who has no understanding of modern, functional fabrics and never goes to the gym. Don’t know whether it’s the same in the English issue of the magazine, but in Dutch it says “Sport shirts often have the disadvantage to be close fitted.  This restricts your movement. Our suggestion: make this shirt with a full draped back.“I didn’t care to check their description of sports shirts they published before, but thought this one was hilarious.Off to trace a pattern from this magazine (not this one).