Skip to main content

Comments and spam

Thanks to JillyBe's post on the dreadful word verification Blogger has put up I did check and found out that the verification was still on, while I thought it was not. Appears that when you are logged in, you don't see this verification on your own blog. Well, I've changed that, and the verification should be gone.

Hoping it will not result in too many spam comments. Speaking of spam comments: now I was in the layout mode for my blog, I found that a number of comments were marked as spam which were not spam but just kind comments from my readers. I did not get a notification for those, so there were even some comments from almost a year ago that were in "quarantaine".
So sorry I didn't notice and your comment didn't come up on the blog. Like everyone in blogland I do like and appreciate every comment.

Comments

  1. I didn't even know there was a quarantine for suspected spam! There's a lot of detail in blogger to keep up with!

    ReplyDelete
  2. And thank you for directing my attention to this. I didn't realize that it was on for my blog either.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ik doe het even in het Nederlands, ik vind het ook super vervelend, ik heb het al een tijdje terug aangepast. Iedereen mag een berichtje bij mij achterlaten, zonder die stomme woordverificatie.
    Goed dat je hier aandacht aan besteed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kleine vergissing, ik dacht dat ik dat aangepast had...Ik ben weer terug naar de oude interface en heb het opnieuw aangepast.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The exact same thing happened to me - I finally figured out how to take word verification off (wish I had seen that post before!), then I discovered a whole stack of quarantined comments. Odd thing was they were regular commenters and there was certainly nothing odd about the words in it either! Geez, Blogger.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I hate it when good stuff goes into spam. It happens a lot, I don't know if my spam filter is sensitive or what...

    Sometimes the spam itself is pretty hilarious, though.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you for removing the W(t)F, and I'm Happy to be helpful! :)

    I found a "spam" comment from a friend some time ago, so I do check the "comments" area in dashboard periodically just to make sure, but it only happened that once. And I've received maybe half a dozen or so real spams in my year of blogging...knocking on wood with fingers crossed that it keeps up!

    I have absolutely no idea why some blogs seem to be targeted & others don't....some things in blogland (and life) simply defy logic, don't they?!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks Sigrid and Jilly. It never occurred to me to check my spam in 'comments'. I've now published two innocent but previously quarantined comments. I'm a bit wary of turning off WF though. Maybe later.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I too hate the new verification at google and have also considered removing it.

    I have also received quite a few spam comments too.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments are very much appreciated! I read all of them, try to answer the questions but don't always have time to react to comments.

Popular posts from this blog

How to sew a sleeveless top with facings

How lovely to read the nice comments on my jacket. Grumpy without coffee commented that the original artist for the cartoon (which apparently was for books) was Sarah Andersen. Thank you for mentioning it. Beckster asked about the way I closed the center back seam of the lining. I did it by machine. She also said “Although I have not tried it, I have been told that the lining can be made by using the pattern minus the seam allowance and facings.” Well, certainly not without seam allowances, it should be without hem and without the facings. Important is that you have about 5 cm hem in the jacket for this to work. And I would always make a center back pleat. It gives you space to move without the lining pulling on the fabric. Next time I make a jacket I will try to make photos of the process of bagging the lining (Patsijean said she would have liked to see them and probably more would be interested). Might take a while though, see the end of this post.-----------------------------I mad…

Dress Burda June 2018, construction picture

Once in a while a pattern shows up in a magazine that I want to make immediately. This Burda dress from the June issue is one of those.

It’s mainly the linedrawing that’s interesting, as the fabric they used for the magazine issue is not really showing the design lines. There would have been better accent options for the piping they uses.
If you’re like me and in general don’t look at the Burda instructions but do it by experience or your way anyhow, DON’T go on autopilot with this one.
Sleeveless dress: I close shoulder seams at the last possible moment. Not here, as you have to sew the bias band in between the center and side parts. The band has no seam (and I wouldn’t add one, too many layers of fabric), so the shoulder has to be sewn earlier than I’m used to.
Darts: I was inclined to sew all darts as first step and realised really just in time that the front dart is taking up the edge of the band. Front and back band! I was stupified why the angle of the band was not matching th…

Hilarious description

This week I bought the January Burda issue and browsing through it this top, and especially its description had my attention. Written by someone who has no understanding of modern, functional fabrics and never goes to the gym. Don’t know whether it’s the same in the English issue of the magazine, but in Dutch it says “Sport shirts often have the disadvantage to be close fitted.  This restricts your movement. Our suggestion: make this shirt with a full draped back.“I didn’t care to check their description of sports shirts they published before, but thought this one was hilarious.Off to trace a pattern from this magazine (not this one).